Common Errors of Interpretation
The relevance of Revelation for today is lost if we ignore its historical context and read it with incorrect presuppositions. The Book of Revelation presents a sweeping picture of the church age that highlights the cosmic “war” that is being waged behind the scenes of History with individual “battles” that manifest in the daily struggles of the Assembly. Its visions show God working through the “Lamb” to implement His Kingdom, and it begins in the first century with the “Seven Assemblies of Asia.”
[Photo by Kaleidico on Unsplash] |
Certainly, the Book’s visions can be difficult to understand and include bizarre images and unexpected twists. However, there are several common mistakes we make all too often when interpreting them, including:
- The insistence on “literal” interpretation.
- The failure to recognize how the Book interprets and applies Old Testament passages.
- The assumption it is only concerned with history’s “final generation.”
- The assumption the Book is focused on national Israel.
- The assumption its visions are presented in chronological order.
SYMBOLISM
In the Book’s first verse, it states how it discloses information - Through visionary symbolism. Jesus “signified” his “revelation” to “his servants,” a rendering of the Greek verb sémainō, which is related to the noun for “sign.” It means “to signify, to show by a sign” - (Strong’s - #G4591).
This sense is apparent in the very first vision. John is told the “Seven Golden Lampstands” represent “Seven Assemblies,” and the “Seven Stars” symbolize “Seven Messengers.” This is symbolism, pure and simple. Other examples demonstrate the same method. For example:
- (4:5) – “And before the throne seven torches of fire, which are the seven spirits of God.”
- (5:6) – “I saw a Lamb standing… with seven horns and with seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God.”
- (11:4) – “The two witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands which stand before the Lord of the earth.”
- (17:9) – “This calls for a mind with wisdom: the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman is seated.”
Jesus is not a literal or actual “lamb with seven eyes and seven horns.” The “seven horns and eyes” represent the “seven spirits of God.” Similarly, the “Two Witnesses” are not two individual men. They are identified as the “Two Lampstands.” Moreover, if the Book’s symbolism is consistent, then they represent churches since elsewhere that is what “lampstands” symbolize - (Revelation 1:20).
OLD TESTAMENT ALLUSIONS
The Book includes more verbal links to the Old Testament than any other New Testament book. Careful attention must be paid to how it applies those passages, and very often, it does so in unexpected ways.
For example, the original summons for Israel to become a “kingdom of priests” is reapplied to the “Seven Assemblies of Asia.” Language from Zechariah that formerly applied to the “tribes” of Israel is universalized and the clause becomes “All the tribes of the Earth” - (Revelation 1:6, 5:10, 20:6, Exodus 19:6, Zechariah 12:10).
The Book does not simply cite verses from the Hebrew Bible - it interprets and reapplies them. Failure to recognize this can lead to erroneous interpretations. For example, the very first verse alludes to the passage from Daniel where the prophet told Nebuchadnezzar that God had revealed to him “what things must come to pass in later days.”
The Book of Revelation quotes this word-for-word from the Greek Septuagint version of Daniel except it changes the last term from “later days” to “SOON.” What for Daniel was in a remote future has become imminent for the “Assemblies of Asia.”
The assumption that the Book focuses on history’s final generation ignores its historical setting. In its entirety, it is addressed to seven congregations in the Roman province of Asia. Its contents are about “things that must SOON come to pass,” and “soon” means from the perspective of the original recipients of the Book - (Revelation 1:1-4, 1:11, 4:1-3, 22:10).
While the significance of its visions may not end with the “Seven Assemblies” in Asia, those congregations are included in them and, therefore, what John saw must be relevant to their historical situations.
Furthermore, the “Seven Assemblies” also form a representative group. They may not exhaust the meanings of the Book’s visions, but they certainly begin with and include them.
Is Revelation primarily about national Israel? Consistently, the people of God are described as the men redeemed by the “Lamb” from every “nation, tribe, people, and tongue.”
Members of the company of the redeemed are identified by their relationship to Jesus, and not their ethnicity. They are the “saints,” those who have the “testimony of Jesus,” and “the faith of Jesus.”
Are the Book’s chapters laid out in chronological order? There are three major battle scenes in Revelation, and each borrows language from Ezekiel’s vision of “Gog and Magog.” Moreover, each one describes the “gathering together” of hostile forces to “the war,” singular, against the saints - (Revelation 16:12-16, 19:17-21, 20:8-10).
Are there three separate final attacks by “Gog and Magog” that are separated by hundreds of years, or is the one final assault against the people of God described from three different perspectives?
In fact, the repeated use of the language from Ezekiel demonstrates conclusively that the same final battle is in view in each related passage – the “war.” Moreover, this reality confirms that the Book’s chapters and visions are NOT in chronological order.
Revelation is about future events but not exclusively so. Its visions are anchored in the past death and resurrection of Jesus, but it also culminates in the New Creation. This means it is not primarily or exclusively about History’s final years, but instead, the entire period during which the Body of Christ exists in this fallen age.
Finally, the Book is as much exhortation as it is predictive prophecy. It is a summons to all the assemblies of Jesus to faithfulness in tribulation as it bears witness to him in a hostile world.
RELATED POSTS:
Comments
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.